The conservative Republican economist says time is money, but a lot depends on whose time and whose money: "A recent study indicates that one-fifth of new home-buyers in California pay at least half of their income for housing. So do nearly one-fourth of California renters. When it costs half of what you make just to put a roof over your head, that is a big restriction on what else you can afford to do. How did this situation come about and why does it continue? Part of the reason is that it is newcomers who have to pay outrageous prices for houses, while it is existing homeowners who vote for laws and policies that drive up housing costs by obstructing the building of new homes. Those who already own their own homes are not hurt by soaring housing prices. In fact, they benefit when the value of their homes becomes several times what they originally paid for them. Given this situation and these incentives, it is easy to understand why such things as planning commissions, 'open space' laws and 'historical preservation' policies proliferate. These road-blocks to building are essentially idealistic-sounding ways of being completely selfish. Despite much liberal rhetoric about compassion for the poor, it is precisely in such overwhelmingly liberal enclaves as those in California where high housing costs resulting from restrictive laws have imposed the heaviest burden on lower income people.....All sorts of lofty talk about 'open space' or 'saving the green foothills' is used to disguise the plain fact that those who already have theirs want to keep other people out, especially other people not as upscale as themselves. Ugly as such selfishness may be, it is no worse than the zealotry of the nature cultists who join with them to make life miserable for thousands of other people in order to give themselves a cheap sense of importance that some confuse with idealism."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
THOMAS SOWELL OP-ED: Time And Money And Housing
0 comments:
Post a Comment