Sign up to Booker Rising's RSS feed to receive updates in your feed reader or sign up with your email address below to receive the updates via email!
* we respect your privacy and will never share your email.

Botswana's Dynasty Of Good Democracy

Rejoice Ngwenya, head of the libertarian Coalition for Liberal Market Solutions (Zimbabwe) has problems with Botswana's one-party political dominance: "There is something fundamentally flawed with so-called ‘democracies’ that perpetuate political, monarchical or tribal dynasty. In Swaziland where The Mswatis rule by decree, in the Democratic Republic of Congo [DRC] where the Kabilas cheat at the ballot box; the Bongos, the Kaddafis and the Mugabes who enforce their will using AK47s – we Africans have grown to tolerate dynastical oppression. But in a country where freedom, choice, multiplicity, tolerance, tranquility and respect for property rights are virtually a way of life, it is impossible to figure out why one political party, the Botswana Democratic Party [BDP] can exert such paralysing influence for over half a century. It is either the Tswanas are too naive or the [ruling family] Khamas are so incredibly good!"

He continues his commentary: "Most international institutions of ‘good governance’ – including our very own IMANI – tout Botswana as one of the ‘best’ democracies in the modern world, and for good reason. The Khama dynasty has long presided over peace, stability and exponential economic growth in the former British protectorate that has never tested political acrimony. With an overall population fewer than two and half million and the world’s largest known reserves of gem diamonds in Jwaneng, this Southern African country has escaped Africa’s traditional resource curse of corruption and crude management that plunges similar economies like Nigeria and the DRC into heart-rending strife. An average 9% growth rate yielding a US$14,000 Gross Domestic Product per capita and sophisticated infrastructure is any African’s dream destination. And yet critics of reigning President Seretse Ian Khama argue that good governance goes beyond the usual indicators of ‘democratic fitness’ like a free economy, zero tolerance to corruption, respect of property rights and 'A' grade credit ratings. The retired military man has been accused of heavy handedness when it comes to using the majority that his BDP enjoys in government. As late as last week, political opponents pointed fingers at him for misusing government funds and resources to ‘reinforce Botswana Democratic Party campaigns in constituencies where the opposition is considered to pose a threat’. The bedrock of Botswana’s democratic culture – the ‘kgotla’ village consultative forum – has been one of the entities that Ian Khama is said to exploit in furthering autocratic and populist interests."

More commentary from Mr. Ngwenya about Botswana: "So what is the problem with Ian Khama’s renewed five-year tenure? Looked every which way, there is evidence, more so in Africa, that one-party political dominance, even if it is a product of a perfect democracy, is not healthy for a nation. South Africans have only known two political parties – the Apartheid sponsored National Party and Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress [ANC]. Generations of Zimbabweans have come and gone under Ian Smith’s Rhodesian Front and Robert Mugabe’s painful rule, not to mention Mozambicans who cannot perceive life without Samora Machel’s FRELIMO party. In all the above cases, the systems have produced complacency, poverty, crime, homelessness, illiteracy and in Zimbabwe’s case, genocide."

Final thoughts from Mr. Ngwenya, including advice for Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe: "Put another way, the case of Khama’s political domination may not necessarily be a gift to the world democratic movement, but compared to American friends in Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and of late, the embattled Afghanistan – we So[u]thern Africans have to give Botswana a standing ovation. An election where literarily all parties campaign under the same roof without a single [political] water glass being broken must be a Guinness Book entry! Zimbabweans may be ‘smarter’ than their Tswana neighbours intellectually, but they have a lot to learn. Mugabe’s resentment of ‘Sir Seretse Khama’s young boy’ is founded in jealousy and envy. Between 1980 and June 2008, Mugabe’s brand of ‘constitutional democracy’ has accounted for over twenty five thousand deaths and three million economic refuges. If this had happened in Botswana, there would be no country to write about! Mr Mugabe, for crying out loud, look across the border, watch and learn on how REAL elections are run."

1 comments:

moks said...

what is democracy? people making their choice of rulers, does having the same party win reduce the democracticness of that process? i do think the article is missing an objective analysis of the recent election results. It would be helpful to look at who actually voted for Khama, with regard to Urban and rural. From the look of things, Khama has won in urban areas, but lost seats in rural areas. This has actually changed the normal pattern which has been that Khama's party won in rural areas. Second Botswana is not a homogenous country, there are more than 15 tribes, but Khama looks as if got votes from across the tribes, but the opposition looks like received votes from certain tribal areas, but lost in mixed tribal areas.

Military man and democracy, if democracies needs militaries to defend the democracy, democracies should be democratic enough to have military people running for elected positions. Just look at Israel, could you say the leaders there are not democratic, as almost all of then have been in the army, how about USA. So its the institutions and the constitution. Zimbabwe's problems lie in the constitution, no difference between civil servants and politics, Just look at Charamba, a permanent secretary who speaks like Zanu-pf secretary, in Botswana, you have to resign as a civil servant if you engage in politics. Take a look at Dailynews(government newspaper), no analytical commentary, only news, but the Herald, is like Fox news in the USA.

So the issue, is much more than just that Khama is a son of a former President, he has principles and people have judged him based on that. If things where about who you are, Botswana's parliament would be full with chiefs and chiefs children, NO, its actually representative of the population in general, anybody can be MP in Botswana. The fact that minister loose election and it is the end of their political life its a normal occurence in Botswana.

In Botswana, Kgotla (traditional gathering place), is not for political campaign, President, Ministers, MPS cannot address people at the Kgotla if its about party issues, only government policies and parliament motions can be discussed at the Kgotla. The President like any president will always have an advantage in that he can use presidential transpost and protection, Just like USA Presidents. so its part of the democratic process, if there is abuse of those powers the is the Ombudsman to log a complaint, and the Ombudsman has in many occasion faulted the government on use of state property

Post a Comment

Copyright 2004-2011. Booker Rising All Rights Reserved. Blog Design by Blog Theme Machine