Sign up to Booker Rising's RSS feed to receive updates in your feed reader or sign up with your email address below to receive the updates via email!
* we respect your privacy and will never share your email.

Charles Onyango-Obbo: "Uganda’s Corrupt Politicians Are The Children Of Africa's Ancient Slave Traders"

Asserts the Ugandan-born moderate columnist in Kenya, about corruption in his native country: "Back home today, the horror stories about mega corruption in the Office of the Prime Minister continue to unfold. This corruption (though this point is not often emphasised) succeeds partly through collusion by officials at the Treasury and Bank of Uganda. This network of officials and political leaders involved in the OPM scandal and the endless others in Uganda over the last 25 years, are true heirs of African slave traders. While 500 years ago they sold children for mirrors and women for bottles of wine, today they steal money meant for medicine, schools, and vaccine for children, and spend it on mirrors, wine, women, cars and extravagant houses."

He continues his commentary: "Some of the cynical donors play pretty much a similar role to that of the European slave traders. To appreciate this, let us look at aid history. Up to about 15 years ago, the bulk of the aid to countries like Uganda was not handled by our officials. The donors gave the aid, and if it was for a road, for example, they would get closely involved in appointing the contractor, and would manage the payments to the company. In Uganda, this period saw the most significant and speedy construction of roads mostly through European Union aid because they handled most of the money. There were many criticisms of this approach; that it was 'neo-colonial'; aid was poorly coordinated and resulted in duplication; and that it was unsustainable because Ugandans needed to develop capacity to manage the aid, and they would only do so by actually taking charge of the money. More and more aid was, therefore, shifted and given as budget support — in other words, it was put into the government’s coffers and it apportioned and spent it as it deemed fit. The benefits of this approach, however, came along with greater corruption — now we had the goods, so we ate them."

Copyright 2004-2011. Booker Rising All Rights Reserved. Blog Design by Blog Theme Machine